We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy on the information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to about the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can create inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

Case law is specific on the jurisdiction in which it had been rendered. For example, a ruling in a very California appellate court would not typically be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI 46 SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have read the realized counsel with the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments since the issues from the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard into the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(one) from the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession of the subjected premises for the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to be decided with the competent court after hearing the parties if pending given that the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer inside the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court needs to see this element for interim custody of the topic premises In the event the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order.

Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that may be consulted in deciding a current case. It may be used to guide the court, but just isn't binding precedent.

This Court might interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer within a way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding attained by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In case the summary or finding is like no reasonable person would have ever attained, the Court may interfere with the conclusion or even the finding and mildew the relief to make it ideal for the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority could be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-appreciate the evidence or even the nature of punishment. Within the aforesaid proposition, we've been fortified by the decision from the Supreme Court from the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more

Civil Courts keep jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it requires legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be created and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more

All executive and judicial authorities throughout Pakistan are obligated to act in support with the Supreme Court, guaranteeing the enforcement of its judgments. As being the Supreme Court would be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision continues to be reached, the decision of your Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in website terms of Article 187(two) from the Constitution. Read more

The court system is then tasked with interpreting the legislation when it truly is unclear how it relates to any provided situation, usually rendering judgments based to the intent of lawmakers plus the circumstances of the case at hand. Such decisions become a guide for upcoming similar cases.

163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually perfectly-settled that whilst considering the case of standard promotion of civil servants, the competent authority should look at the benefit of all of the suitable candidates and after owing deliberations, to grant promotion to this kind of suitable candidates who are found being most meritorious among them. Considering that the petitioner was held to generally be senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was disregarded with the respondent department just to increase favor for the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy around the part in the respondent department.

The legislation of necessity regarded and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it was the illegal action called regulation of necessity..

twelve . Const. P. 245/2025 (S.B.) Qurban Ali S/o Qasim V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The regulation enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair to the offender as well as Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other courts Nevertheless they have didn't have any corrective effect on it.

Problems or Errors Should you encounter any technical problems with this website (such as a undesirable link or a portion of the opinion missing), please notify the eService Middle.

Normally, only an appeal accepted from the court of very last vacation resort will resolve such differences and, for many reasons, these kinds of appeals are frequently not granted.

Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” are not binding, but could be used as persuasive authority, which is to offer substance for the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.